This variable is now mutable, making the uppercase format misleading.
For instance, users might assume they can use this value in other
immutable properties, when they really should be accessing the latest
value every time they need it.
Context: https://source.android.com/docs/setup/contribute/code-style#follow-field-naming-conventions
Test: Manual
Bug: 271160958
Change-Id: Iaaa51d9153cb8a7d686c72e1210b1948029dcfd5
This will help SysUI test team (who uses TAPL) to set up Gradle build for their tests.
Bug: 202567877, 234414088
Test: presubmit
Change-Id: I3d923ea4b54d1a4c3d2b345be09692727d30433e
There is a guaranteed order in which TIS events will be registered
relative to other TIS events. However, relative to the touch events
arriving to the activity, TIS events can come in any order.
Now the event checker verifies 2 independent ordered event sequences:
from TIS, and “the rest” (Main).
Change-Id: I5872e0e3b0b498050a91c67105fbe4a29411375a
Investigation of TAPL failures, especially flakes is complex, partially
because it’s hard to tell whether it’s Launcher who is wrong or the
system.
We need to introduce a framework that looks at Launcher interaction with
the system and reports when interactions deviate from the expected
course, and who made the first wrong step.
This is first, proof-of-concept CL.
It analyzes long-press events. We had multiple cases when long-presses
didn’t happen or happened unexpectedly.
Launcher registers the events, TAPL retrieves and compares against the
sequence of expected regular expressions. This diagnostic is used when
something fails and at the end of public methods.
Change-Id: I07aa3a027267c03422c99c73ccd8808445c55fe8
